On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:30 PM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010, Jason Swails wrote:
>>
>> When I tried compiling a new version of amber11 checked out of the
>> tree today, it failed when trying to build pbsa (specifically
>> simplepbsa).
>
> This is weird. I don't see why the Makefile should be dealing with
> simplepbsa at all. Do you have version 10.30 of amber11/src/pbsa/Makefile?
>
According to Entries in the CVS directory, yes.
> That said, the Makefile in CVS should probably not refer to simplepbsa at
> all -- as I understand it, this is just sample code that users won't be
> seeing (and that we won't be documenting, for example.)
The Makefile has lines
simplepbsa$(SFX): simplepbsa.o gopt.o libpbsa.a sfflib syslib netlib c9x-complex
$(FC) -nofor_main -o simplepbsa$(SFX) simplepbsa.o gopt.o libpbsa.a \
$(LIBDIR)/libsff.a ../lib/nxtsec.o $(FLIBSF) $(LDFLAGS)
which are invoked by the top-level Makefile_at. I added the
-nofor_main after looking at the intel forums, and it built just fine
for the intel 11 compilers. I don't know the equivalent for the PGI
compilers (though it might be the same?)
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
All the best,
Jason
--
---------------------------------------
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Feb 09 2010 - 12:00:03 PST
