Re: [AMBER-Developers] simplepbsa build errors with commercial compilers

From: MengJuei Hsieh <mengjueh.uci.edu>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:43:59 -0800

Ah, actually I put it in the libinstall rule, which probably shouldn't be
including simplepbsa at all. I just checked-in to fix that.

Best,

-- 
Mengjuei Hsieh, Molecular Biology & Biochem, Univ. of California Irvine.
> From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
> Reply-To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:30:03 -0500
> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
> Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] simplepbsa build errors with commercial
> compilers
> 
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010, Jason Swails wrote:
>> 
>> When I tried compiling a new version of amber11 checked out of the
>> tree today, it failed when trying to build pbsa (specifically
>> simplepbsa).
> 
> This is weird.  I don't see why the Makefile should be dealing with
> simplepbsa at all.  Do you have version 10.30 of amber11/src/pbsa/Makefile?
> 
> That said, the Makefile in CVS should probably not refer to simplepbsa at
> all -- as I understand it, this is just sample code that users won't be
> seeing (and that we won't be documenting, for example.)
> 
> ....dac
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers

Received on Tue Feb 09 2010 - 12:00:04 PST