Re: [AMBER-Developers] DLPC

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:01:05 -0400

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Pawel Janowski <pawelrc.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we should respect the residue naming assigned by the PDB. That's
> the best way to avoid these types of uncertainty in the future. So if you
> look for LA in http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe-srv/pdbechem/ it turns out it is
> the residue name for La3+. I would keep LA for La3+ and find a different
> name for the other component (or check if one already exists in the PDB
> dictionary; you can search by chemical formula).

Big +1

All the best,
Jason

--
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Mar 24 2015 - 12:30:03 PDT
Custom Search