Dave, this may be true but in my opinion it just reinforces our view of your
scientific leadership ability...
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:52 PM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> Thanks to all of you who have sent kind notes about the list of chemists
> with
> high impact factors. But "my" impact factor really reflects work of the
> entire Amber community, as you can see by looking at some of the most
> highly-cited papers in the 2000-2010 time period:
>
> Amber overview paper in JCC: 982 citations
> GAFF force field 903 "
> review of MM-PBSA 654 "
> force field review with Jay Ponder 438 "
> GB papers with Don Bashford & Alexey: 424, 259, 230
> GB paper with Vickie Tsui: 227
> antechamber paper 179
>
> etc.
>
> So, I need to thank all of you: the ranking really reflects the dedication
> and hard work, careful science, and novel insights coming from the entire
> Amber developer and user community.
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Feb 16 2011 - 10:00:09 PST
