Well said ...
> From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
> Reply-To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:55:31 -0500
> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
> Cc: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
> Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] impact factors
>
> Dave, this may be true but in my opinion it just reinforces our view of your
> scientific leadership ability...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:52 PM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to all of you who have sent kind notes about the list of chemists
>> with
>> high impact factors. But "my" impact factor really reflects work of the
>> entire Amber community, as you can see by looking at some of the most
>> highly-cited papers in the 2000-2010 time period:
>>
>> Amber overview paper in JCC: 982 citations
>> GAFF force field 903 "
>> review of MM-PBSA 654 "
>> force field review with Jay Ponder 438 "
>> GB papers with Don Bashford & Alexey: 424, 259, 230
>> GB paper with Vickie Tsui: 227
>> antechamber paper 179
>>
>> etc.
>>
>> So, I need to thank all of you: the ranking really reflects the dedication
>> and hard work, careful science, and novel insights coming from the entire
>> Amber developer and user community.
>>
>> ....dac
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER-Developers mailing list
>> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Feb 22 2011 - 17:00:02 PST
