Re: [AMBER-Developers] beta of pmemd.cuda.MPI available in git tree

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:25:20 -0400

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010, Thorsten M Woelfle wrote:
>
> Ok, that means either old driver or old binary. I assume you have rebuild the binary with
>
> cd NVIDIA_GPU_Computing_SDK/
> cd C/
> make

I tried both "make" and "make x86_64=1": same result.

>
> and nvcc --version looked something like that
>
> nvcc --version
> nvcc: NVIDIA (R) Cuda compiler driver
> Copyright (c) 2005-2010 NVIDIA Corporation
> Built on Mon_Jun__7_18:56:31_PDT_2010
> Cuda compilation tools, release 3.1, V0.2.1221

I have the above.

>
> cat /proc/driver/nvidia/version

NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 256.44 Thu Jul 29 01:22:44
PDT 2010
GCC version: gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)

> modprobe nvidia
returns nothing.

>
> Rerun the nvidia_driver.run script

This seems fine...it says it is creating a kernel module; lsmod reports this:

[case.casegroup1]/sbin% ./lsmod | grep nv
nvidia 11113664 0
i2c_core 56641 3 nvidia,i2c_ec,i2c_i801


> ....and make sure that you have the kernel-sources of you
> kernel installed.

??? don't understand how one does this.

> The last thing I can imagine is that the card is not working.
>
> If you have the module loaded, show what is in /dev
>

[case.casegroup1]/sbin% ls -l /dev/ | grep nv
crw-rw---- 1 root root 10, 144 Aug 6 14:56 nvram

Of course, I don't know if my module is "loaded" or not...


Thanks for your help! I'll try cycling the power, etc, tomorrow.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Mon Aug 23 2010 - 15:30:04 PDT
Custom Search