Re: [AMBER-Developers] final (!?!) release candidate for Amber11

From: David A. Case <>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:11:15 -0400

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010, David A. Case wrote:
> If I understand correctly, for gcc 4.1.2 we should use "-g -O2" instead of
> "-O3" -- also for cygwin probably, since the same tests are failing there.
> Do we(you) know if "-O2" would work, or is the "-g" also needed?
> Dan: can you try the above on cygwin?

Apologies: I see Volodymyr is now using gcc 4.4.2 on BSD, not 4.1.2. Still
the similarities in errors between that a cygwin still make it seem likely
that testing lower optimization on cygwin might be worth a try.


AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Thu Apr 15 2010 - 15:30:04 PDT
Custom Search