Re: [AMBER-Developers] near-final testing

From: MengJuei Hsieh <mengjueh.uci.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:39:46 -0700

Hi,

I just got a chance to test the April 14 RC on cygwin and found out
*pbsa_tsr and *pbsa_delphi still have the problem of allocating memory. It
would be nice if anyone can help us to test this on the system with larger
memory, since I only have access to some a virtualbox with small memory. In
the meantime, I can only say that we are aware of the problem and I am
working on the fix this, but that's probably going to be patches (if any)
after the release.

Best,

-- 
Mengjuei Hsieh, Molecular Biology & Biochem, Univ. of California Irvine.
> From: Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:16:11 -0400
> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> 4. Dan: can we get a current picture of what cygwin is doing?
> Results for CYGWIN serial have been posted on the wiki. Most of the problems
> seem to be with either sleap or pbsa. I suspect the pbsa issues could be
> more problems with CYGWIN's small stack size as all the pbsa failures seem
> to happen at the allocation stage.
> General note: errors are over-counted, occasionally 1 error will generate 2
> error messages, e.g.:
> cd pbsa_tsr && ./Run.tsrb.min
>>   ./Run.tsrb.min:  Program error
>> make: *** [test.pbsa] Error 1
> RC 08apr10
> System: CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.7.2 i686 on Athlon 64 X2 4400+
> Compilers: GNU 4.3.4
> ./configure -noX11 -cygwin gnu
> test_at_serial
>      212 file comparisons passed
>      2 file comparisons failed
>      3 tests experienced errors
> * cd sander_pbsa_tsr    && ./Run.tsrb.min
>> From the output:
>  SA Bomb in sa_arc(): Allocates aborted           0           0
>> 5014           0           0
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers

Received on Thu Apr 15 2010 - 16:00:02 PDT