Re: [AMBER-Developers] configure/BINTRAJ

From: Volodymyr Babin <vbabin.ncsu.edu>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:53:49 -0500 (EST)

> I've commited a "fix", but this should be tested. As I understand things,
> in the new scheme one can only build a parallel set of programs *after*
> first building in serial, since the regular netcdf libraries are made
> during the serial build, but needed in parallel.

Thank you. It works and adds -DBINTRAJ to the pp flags if pnetcdf
configure succeeded.

> This seems dangerous and counter-intuitive. Should we just always
> configure
> netcdf itself (unless -nobintraj is requested)? Is there something I am
> missing here?

IMHO this indeed would be more intuitive than the two-pass compilation.

Best,

Volodymyr

_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sun Dec 13 2009 - 19:00:03 PST
Custom Search