On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Volodymyr Babin wrote:
>
> I am probably missing something really simple: when I tried
> new ./configure -mpi gnu I was surprised to find that BINTRAJ
> is no longer set.
I've commited a "fix", but this should be tested. As I understand things,
in the new scheme one can only build a parallel set of programs *after*
first building in serial, since the regular netcdf libraries are made during
the serial build, but needed in parallel.
This seems dangerous and counter-intuitive. Should we just always configure
netcdf itself (unless -nobintraj is requested)? Is there something I am
missing here?
...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sun Dec 13 2009 - 07:00:02 PST
