Re: [AMBER-Developers] configure/BINTRAJ

From: Lachele Foley <lfoley.ccrc.uga.edu>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:18:23 -0500

> This seems dangerous and counter-intuitive. Should we just always configure
> netcdf itself (unless -nobintraj is requested)? Is there something I am
> missing here?

Is this in any way related to my issue of DBINTRAJ being in the compiler list even if netcdf fails? If it's too twisty to make all the scenarios work, then a configure-fail instruction would be sufficient for my situation -- something to the effect of "Sorry, netcdf cannot be configured on your system. Please re-run configure with the -nobintraj option." If that means there can't be a parallel AT, add a sentence about that, too.


:-) Lachele 
--
B. Lachele Foley, PhD '92,'02
Assistant Research Scientist
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, UGA
706-542-0263
lfoley.ccrc.uga.edu
----- Original Message -----
From: case
[mailto:case.biomaps.rutgers.edu]
To: AMBER Developers Mailing List
[mailto:amber-developers.ambermd.org]
Sent: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:30:51
-0500
Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] configure/BINTRAJ
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Volodymyr Babin wrote:
> > 
> > I am probably missing something really simple: when I tried
> > new ./configure -mpi gnu I was surprised to find that BINTRAJ
> > is no longer set.
> 
> I've commited a "fix", but this should be tested.  As I understand things,
> in the new scheme one can only build a parallel set of programs *after*
> first building in serial, since the regular netcdf libraries are made during
> the serial build, but needed in parallel.
> 
> This seems dangerous and counter-intuitive.  Should we just always configure
> netcdf itself (unless -nobintraj is requested)?  Is there something I am
> missing here?
> 
> ...dac
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> 
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sun Dec 13 2009 - 11:30:03 PST
Custom Search