Re: [AMBER-Developers] Tutorials

From: Hai Nguyen <nhai.qn.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 23:25:01 -0400

Just FYI: bootstrap is very popular, you might want to have a look:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrap_(front-end_framework)

Hai

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, David Cerutti <dscerutti.gmail.com> wrote:

> It's not in the master. The constant pH demonstration is still in there, I
> just moved it to a different section thinking it wasn't necessarily
> "accelerated MD." If I missed a tutorial it's very easy to add--there's
> just one line in the ToC per tutorial.
>
> If the numbering scheme is haphazard and confusing it is because I am
> retaining the numbering scheme that was already there. It may only look
> haphazard now that all of the tutorials can be browsed in groups.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 28, 2016, at 7:20 PM, David Cerutti <dscerutti.gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've mirrored the new site here:
> > >
> > > http://casegroup.rutgers.edu/~cerutti/amber_web/tutorials/
> > >
> >
> > It's not clear to me that this is an improvement. To start with, there is
> > at least one tutorial missing from the table of contents (the constant ph
> > one). Not sure if there are more.
> >
> > The numbering scheme is also haphazard and confusing (the links don't
> have
> > to match the names).
> >
> > Lastly, having everything on the same page makes it easier to search with
> > little things like searching for text. It also removes the need to keep
> > tutorials listed and updated in 2 places (the ToC and the other pages
> they
> > belong in), making it easier to maintain and less likely to fall out of
> > sync (and become even more confusing).
> >
> > On the whole, I liked the last layout more. Also, the change *to* that
> > layout followed a lengthy conversation (and it was within the past few
> > years). I think this change should be reversed in master for now and
> > discuss some before such changes are made.
> >
> > All the best,
> > Jason
> >
> > >
> > > The front page looks as intended, but I've done some things to a
> special
> > > tutorials.css style sheet that break the captions in some of the
> > > descriptions if you peruse the various sections (some tutorials' ToC
> > > graphics are a lot bigger than 128 x 128). The reason for this change
> > was
> > > that there are some really pretty images in there that don't show up
> > well,
> > > and I want people to be able to make images with a size that suits them
> > for
> > > their ToC blurb. I've more or less fixed all of the pages except for
> > Dan's
> > > CPPTraj examples. However, if anyone can help me fix this business
> about
> > > images over-running the boxes around each ToC item, that would be very
> > > helpful. See, for example:
> > >
> > > http://casegroup.rutgers.edu/~cerutti/amber_web/tutorials/
> > AdvancedSetup.html
> > >
> > > If we can fix that over-running problem then all of the tutorials will
> > get
> > > a fair shake and future contributors will have good artistic license.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:00 PM, David Cerutti <dscerutti.gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This is what I was asking Dave earlier; I was under the impression
> > that,
> > >>> like the software, there is a moderation process and so things that
> get
> > >>> pushed to master are NOT world-viewable until they graduate from the
> > >> master
> > >>> branch to the directories actually on ambermd.org/ , but apparently
> I
> > am
> > >>> mistaken and anyone with write access to amber_web can change the
> > webpage
> > >>> at will.
> > >>
> > >> Sort of. The 'upstream' repository is not the live website, but the
> > live
> > >> website pulls from it.
> > >>
> > >> But it's inconvenient for most people to do real-world testing on a
> > >> proposed change without making the webpage live (most people won't be
> > able
> > >> to look at it until it goes live).
> > >>
> > >> So don't make any changes to the master branch that you don't intend
> to
> > go
> > >> live immediately as a general rule of thumb.
> > >>
> > >> All the best,
> > >> Jason
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jason M. Swails
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> > >> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> > >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > AMBER-Developers mailing list
> > > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER-Developers mailing list
> > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Sep 28 2016 - 20:30:03 PDT
Custom Search