On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, Dave Cerutti wrote:
>
> I propose to make some changes to the ordering and grouping of the
> tutorials, but none will be left out. The big change will be to have five
> or six sub-pages that users can open in order to access the various
> tutorials. The index page will retain most of its look and feel, but the
> ToC will be expanded to have not just links to each sub-page but also a
> listing with #links for each tutorial.
In my opinion, this is not really an improvement. It makes it harder to
browse through all the tutorials--the user has you visit a bunch of pages
to get an idea of what tutorials are available. The existing table of
contents at the top of the tutorials page (which could be improved) allows
users to jump to a particular area of interest, which still allowing the
"browsing" feature.
>
> I've also made some minor alterations to the tutorial abstracts. I'm
> inclined to do away with calling tutorials "Advanced" because the notion of
> advanced concepts in Amber has evolved somewhat over the years, but the
> numbering system will stay in place anticipating that reflector
> conversations cannot be retroactively changed. I have edited the page
> source to stop warning people if things are for "Amber 9 or later" but more
> recent additions retain those warnings.
Above stuff sounds fine...thanks....dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Sep 28 2016 - 06:00:07 PDT
