Does it happen with the GNU compilers?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
> MKL_HOME makes no difference either way - same problem.
>
> --skip-python avoids the issue.
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 2016, at 18:30, David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016, Ross Walker wrote:
> >
> >> [rcw.comet-ln3 amber]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
> >> CentOS release 6.7 (Final)
> >>
> >> ./configure intel
> >> (I said yes to download the miniconda stuff)
> >> make
> >>
> >> (cd parmed && /home/rcw/amber/bin/amber.python setup.py install
> --no-setuptools -f --prefix=/home/rcw/amber
> --install-scripts=/home/rcw/amber/bin)
> >> OpenBLAS: pthread_creat error in blas_thread_init function. Error
> code:11
> >
> > Just curious: does the --skip-python flag at least allow one to get
> around
> > this problem?
> >
> > Second question: Does it make a difference if you load the MKL module?
> > (MKL provides its own version of BLAS, and it may be most people (like
> me)
> > that test intel builds also use MKL.)
> >
> > ...dac
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER-Developers mailing list
> > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
--
Jason M. Swails
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Mar 22 2016 - 20:00:04 PDT
