>
> I think AMBER only needs to make pmemd private repo (or I know at least
> pytraj, cpptraj, parmed, pymsmt are public repos). Here is the price
> https://github.com/pricing
>
> ($25/month for organization with 10 private repos)
Yeah I saw that just now - although it's not clear how big those repos are allowed to be. Note what we really want is, I believe, a single repo called AMBER where parts of it are private and parts of it are public and depending on how one authenticates determines what parts you can see. Running it as two separate repos would be a pain I think and ideally we want to preserve the idea that AmberTools is the 'free' component of the overall AMBER software suite so if we want to open up the AmberTools part of the repo to public development we have to figure how to do this. Or we make components of this public - e.g. the cpptraj part, the pytraj part etc - for this we will need fine grain authentication methods and I don't know if GitHub supports that.
<can_of_worms>BTW, this all works great until some gets scooped on something they did and made public while it was being developed. It will happen sooner or later - think we end up making force fields that are under development public etc etc...</can_of_worms>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Feb 24 2016 - 15:00:03 PST
