Sorry, I meant “able to test it later” :)
Anyway, my git pull finally worked. Now Na+ appears on the list, and I can add Na+ ions with the command "addions2 gab Na+ 0”, as expected.
Still, I’d suggest a big error message in case the user forgets to load ion parameters explicitly…
Thanks!
Gustavo Seabra
On Feb 26, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Gustavo Seabra <gustavo.seabra.gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Pawel,
>>
>> Was this change made recently? (I am trying to do a git pull here, but the
>> system is incredibly slow, and I'll only be abel totes it later).
>>
>
> Yes, Pawel found this and fixed it this morning (EST) -- I think it was
> pushed in the afternoon...
>
> I was apparently wrong in that this was 'expected behavior' (I only recall
> the discussions and the commits that changed the ion names to the PDB
> standard -- I missed the commit where Dave introduced backwards
> compatibility).
>
> I would still say that the 'new' names are recommended, though (if only to
> play nice with the PDB).
>
> All the best,
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> BioMaPS,
> Rutgers University
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Feb 26 2014 - 12:00:03 PST
