Re: [AMBER-Developers] more on

From: Scott Brozell <>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:23:41 -0500


Perhaps off base, but when i ran configure from a fresh
git master last night, ie, 3am est today, configure also spewed
some stuff about 1 un-applied patch.

So should patch more elegantly handle this (no need to patch the repo)
lots of possible or's omitted for my convenience.


On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:52:58PM -0500, Jason Swails wrote:
> Yea, I sent you an email about this privately. handles lack of Internet just fine. What it doesn't handle is the website being down, since it isn't being connected even though it has Internet access. I'll look into the API some to see if I can trigger some type of timeout behavior.
> The reason it's registering an unapplied patch is because it uses the return code to determine the number of unapplied patches available. The ctrl-c killed the script with an error code of 1, which is why you got that result.
> I'll put something in to catch a sigint so this doesn't happen.
> On Feb 8, 2012, at 5:39 PM, "David A. Case" <> wrote:
> > Just to note that is down right now; but we should
> > make the configuration procedure robust to such events.

AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Wed Feb 08 2012 - 17:30:03 PST
Custom Search