The patch has been updated and tested with pmemd.cuda, and it now works.
I've just added it to bugfix.19 with a note about upgrading it in the
description.
It's ready for activation to the main website.
Thanks!
Jason
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:41 AM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011, Jason Swails wrote:
>> >
>> > Also, I have an AmberTools 1.5 + Amber11 with bug fixes repository that
>> I
>> > created and am storing locally on our git server (which is what I've
>> been
>> > using to test builds). If desired, I can just go ahead and push this
>> > branch to git.ambermd.org if the powers that be create an amber11.git
>> > repository in gitosis.
>>
>> ??? Why to the "powers that be" need to do anything? Would this not be
>> just
>> another branch under the amber.git rubric? Why do we need an amber11.git
>> repo?
>>
>
> I could just make it another branch, but the way I have it, it's a whole
> new repository (hence my line of thinking). Should I just make it a new
> branch to the repo?
>
> I just kind of considered AT15 + Amber11 as a special case. If we do make
> an at15-amber11-with-patches branch. What should we do with the existing
> at15-with-patches and amber11-with-patches branches if we create this new
> branch?
>
> All the best,
> Jason
>
>
>>
>> ...dave
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER-Developers mailing list
>> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> Quantum Theory Project,
> University of Florida
> Ph.D. Candidate
> 352-392-4032
>
--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Nov 23 2011 - 09:30:03 PST
