Re: [AMBER-Developers] AMBER11 bugfix #19 is broken

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:50:18 -0500

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:41 AM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011, Jason Swails wrote:
> >
> > Also, I have an AmberTools 1.5 + Amber11 with bug fixes repository that I
> > created and am storing locally on our git server (which is what I've been
> > using to test builds). If desired, I can just go ahead and push this
> > branch to git.ambermd.org if the powers that be create an amber11.git
> > repository in gitosis.
>
> ??? Why to the "powers that be" need to do anything? Would this not be
> just
> another branch under the amber.git rubric? Why do we need an amber11.git
> repo?
>

I could just make it another branch, but the way I have it, it's a whole
new repository (hence my line of thinking). Should I just make it a new
branch to the repo?

I just kind of considered AT15 + Amber11 as a special case. If we do make
an at15-amber11-with-patches branch. What should we do with the existing
at15-with-patches and amber11-with-patches branches if we create this new
branch?

All the best,
Jason


>
> ...dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>



-- 
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Nov 23 2011 - 08:00:04 PST
Custom Search