On Sat, Nov 05, 2011, Timothy Giese wrote:
> If parts of AMBERTools were compiled with amber proper to create an
> amber executable in which both parts of code shared the same address
> space, then both AMBERTools and amber-proper are bound by the terms of
> the gpl.
Not quite: we actually offer AmberTools under a dual license. One is GPL
which is available to everyone. The second is to Amber, and authorizes
Amber to link AmberTools into the non-GPL Amber code.
It's actually rather common to have the same code licensed in two ways like
this.
...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sat Nov 05 2011 - 07:00:03 PDT
