Hi,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:
> current plans to complete sleap. As it stands now, should we continue to
> build and release sleap by default when there are several bits of advice
> sent out *not* to use sleap because it's unreliable? Is it even still
> being developed?
>
> (I use it on occasion where I'm doing weird stuff that causes a tleap
> segfault, but sleap handles OK, but I just use tleap now).
I think the only major thing sleap does that tleap doesn't do is set
up parms for AMOEBA right?
-Dan
--
-------------------------
Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Postdoctoral Associate
BioMaPS Institute, Rutgers University
610 Taylor Road
Piscataway, NJ 08854
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Nov 02 2011 - 14:00:02 PDT
