Re: [AMBER-Developers] Experiences with sleap

From: Daniel Roe <>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:36:31 -0400


On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Jason Swails <> wrote:
> current plans to complete sleap.  As it stands now, should we continue to
> build and release sleap by default when there are several bits of advice
> sent out *not* to use sleap because it's unreliable?  Is it even still
> being developed?
> (I use it on occasion where I'm doing weird stuff that causes a tleap
> segfault, but sleap handles OK, but I just use tleap now).

I think the only major thing sleap does that tleap doesn't do is set
up parms for AMOEBA right?


Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Postdoctoral Associate
BioMaPS Institute, Rutgers University
610 Taylor Road
Piscataway, NJ   08854
AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Wed Nov 02 2011 - 14:00:02 PDT
Custom Search