On Tue, Jun 14, 2011, Jason Swails wrote:
> This sounds like a patch has been applied twice (an error that shouldn't
> crop up, really).
I agree. This error has arisen repeatedly. Can Dan (or someone) try to
reproduce this (by applying the bugfix patch twice)? The patch *should*
ignore any changes that have already been made.
...thx...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Jun 14 2011 - 05:00:11 PDT