Hi,
This problem occurred because I had been documenting my functions in a
very uniform way, so some patch insertion points ended up looking
unchanged after the patch was applied, allowing recursive application
of the patch. I have fixed all such problems (fixes are already pushed
to amber_web) so that this no longer occurs. My apologies for not
catching this earlier.
-Dan
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:55 AM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011, Jason Swails wrote:
>
>> This sounds like a patch has been applied twice (an error that shouldn't
>> crop up, really).
>
> I agree. This error has arisen repeatedly. Can Dan (or someone) try to
> reproduce this (by applying the bugfix patch twice)? The patch *should*
> ignore any changes that have already been made.
>
> ...thx...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Jun 14 2011 - 07:00:04 PDT
