Re: [AMBER-Developers] force field naming

From: <dcerutti.rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:22:41 -0400 (EDT)

Perhaps a good response to this naming problem would be to put some
information in chapter 1 or 2 of the manual concerning all of these force
fields. The details could go in an appendix, but that appendix should
then be mentioned prominently in several places to make sure that any time
someone is reading through the manual to learn how to do something related
to implementing force fields, they find the list of force fields with
related descriptions and references. It would also help the community to
unravel the process of citing force fields, which can be complicated if
the force field is borrowing various terms from its predecessors.

Dave


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Thu Apr 28 2011 - 13:30:04 PDT
Custom Search