> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011, Martin Peters wrote:
> >
> > Is the following recipe ok for final testing?
Sorry: looks like my earlier reply was wrong, since I think I misunderstood
what you were proposing (or I was just too tired.)
> > % git clone gitosis.git.ambermd.org:amber.git amber11
> > % git checkout amber11-with-patches
> > % csh mkrelease [ "./mkrelease" would be better]
> > % cd .. ; mkdir RC ; cd RC
> > % mv ../Amber11.12apr11.tar.bz2 .
> > % bunzip Amber11.12apr11.tar.bz2 ; tar -xvf Amber11.12apr11.tar
> > % wget http://ambermd.org/downloads/AmberTools.10apr11.tar.bz2
> > % bunzip AmberTools.10apr11.tar ; tar -xvf AmberTools.10apr11.tar
> > ... configure/build/test...
The above *should* work (assuming the the current "mkrelease" script
still reflects what was done a year ago. (A quick look at the git log
suggests that this is the case.)
This tests the AmberTools1.5-on-top-of-Amber11 scenario, which is probably not
tested enough. So, yes, please try the above. Apologies for the earlier
mis-post.
...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Apr 12 2011 - 18:30:02 PDT
