> I don't understand. If you have "them set up separately" how did you do it?
> How do keep them (two?) in sync with each other? What makes it "safer and
> saner"? Basically, I don't understand how you have things set up for
> glylib.
I sort-of copied the idea from here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#public-repositories
See the diagram just a short scroll down.
The only difference is that instead of "your public repo" I have one central "deposit repo," and I pull from there to the main repo. I chose the slight alteration because not everyone has a computer that has public access from which I can pull -- and to limit the number of places I had to pull from. Our web designer set up the web site differently, so it's not the only way.
Honestly, when I set it up I was thoroughly confused and groping around, but what that means is that if something really screwy gets pushed to the "depository" (as in makes the repo behave badly -- not just a coding error), people can still clone from the public repo without cloning the screwy bits.
If curious, here's our docs: http://128.192.9.183/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GIT
(the IP address not for public sharing, please)
Also, read those docs with the thought "produced on a crisis-to-crisis basis" in mind.
Feel free to steal/share any of the text/docs if you like them.
> Both the "master" branch and the "amber11" branch are definitely there, but
> maybe there is some additional incantation needed to get them both -- does
> "git clone" only get the master branch? Can any git guru help Jason out here?
I am *NOT* a guru, but... Are they different? I think you have to pull from both, and say where they're being pulled to, and then merge them together if you pull to different places. But, I can't recall off the top of my head.
:-) Lachele
--
B. Lachele Foley, PhD '92,'02
Assistant Research Scientist
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, UGA
706-542-0263
lfoley.ccrc.uga.edu
----- Original Message -----
From: case
[mailto:case.biomaps.rutgers.edu]
To: AMBER Developers Mailing List
[mailto:amber-developers.ambermd.org]
Sent: Tue, 11 May 2010 17:43:08
-0400
Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] New Patch Procedures...
> On Tue, May 11, 2010, Lachele Foley wrote:
>
> > > How will we know when commit access is open? (Or, rather, I should say
> 'push' access).
>
> Email.
>
> >
> > heh... push is not the opposite of pull. (learned the hard way trying to
> > work from home)
> >
> > Will we push and pull from the same bare repo? I have them set up
> > separately for glylib. It seemed saner and safer that way, but YMMV.
>
> I don't understand. If you have "them set up separately" how did you do it?
> How do keep them (two?) in sync with each other? What makes it "safer and
> saner"? Basically, I don't understand how you have things set up for
> glylib.
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue May 11 2010 - 15:30:03 PDT
