Custom Search
-- B. Lachele Foley, PhD '92,'02 Assistant Research Scientist Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, UGA 706-542-0263 lfoley.ccrc.uga.edu ----- Original Message ----- From: Lachele Foley [mailto:lfoley.ccrc.uga.edu] To: AMBER Developers Mailing List [mailto:amber-developers.ambermd.org] Sent: Tue, 11 May 2010 18:03:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] New Patch Procedures... > > I don't understand. If you have "them set up separately" how did you do > it? > > How do keep them (two?) in sync with each other? What makes it "safer and > > saner"? Basically, I don't understand how you have things set up for > > glylib. > > I sort-of copied the idea from here: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#public-repositories > > See the diagram just a short scroll down. > > The only difference is that instead of "your public repo" I have one central > "deposit repo," and I pull from there to the main repo. I chose the slight > alteration because not everyone has a computer that has public access from > which I can pull -- and to limit the number of places I had to pull from. > Our web designer set up the web site differently, so it's not the only way. > > Honestly, when I set it up I was thoroughly confused and groping around, but > what that means is that if something really screwy gets pushed to the > "depository" (as in makes the repo behave badly -- not just a coding error), > people can still clone from the public repo without cloning the screwy bits. > > If curious, here's our docs: > http://128.192.9.183/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GIT > (the IP address not for public sharing, please) > Also, read those docs with the thought "produced on a crisis-to-crisis > basis" in mind. > Feel free to steal/share any of the text/docs if you like them. > > > Both the "master" branch and the "amber11" branch are definitely there, > but > > maybe there is some additional incantation needed to get them both -- does > > "git clone" only get the master branch? Can any git guru help Jason out > here? > > I am *NOT* a guru, but... Are they different? I think you have to pull > from both, and say where they're being pulled to, and then merge them > together if you pull to different places. But, I can't recall off the top > of my head. > > :-) Lachele > -- > B. Lachele Foley, PhD '92,'02 > Assistant Research Scientist > Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, UGA > 706-542-0263 > lfoley.ccrc.uga.edu > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: case > [mailto:case.biomaps.rutgers.edu] > To: AMBER Developers Mailing List > [mailto:amber-developers.ambermd.org] > Sent: Tue, 11 May 2010 17:43:08 > -0400 > Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] New Patch Procedures... > > > > On Tue, May 11, 2010, Lachele Foley wrote: > > > > > > How will we know when commit access is open? (Or, rather, I should > say > > 'push' access). > > > > Email. > > > > > > > > heh... push is not the opposite of pull. (learned the hard way trying to > > > work from home) > > > > > > Will we push and pull from the same bare repo? I have them set up > > > separately for glylib. It seemed saner and safer that way, but YMMV. > > > > I don't understand. If you have "them set up separately" how did you do > it? > > How do keep them (two?) in sync with each other? What makes it "safer and > > saner"? Basically, I don't understand how you have things set up for > > glylib. > > > > ....dac > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AMBER-Developers mailing list > > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers > > > > _______________________________________________ > AMBER-Developers mailing list > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers > _______________________________________________ AMBER-Developers mailing list AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developersReceived on Tue May 11 2010 - 16:00:05 PDT