On 16/4/2010, at 2:11 p.m., Gustavo Seabra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Gustavo Seabra
>> <gustavo.seabra.gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Testing on Ubuntu 9.10, with gnu compilers v4.4.1,
>>>
>>> only AmberTools installed, serial, I get:
>>>
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/seabra/local/amber/amber11/AmberTools/test'
>>> 314 file comparisons passed
>>> 0 file comparisons failed
>>> 4 tests experienced errors
>>> Test log file saved as logs/test_at_serial/2010-04-16_12-18-14.log
>>> No test diffs to save!
>>>
>>> The tests that experienced errors are:
>>> cd ./rism1d/spc && Run.spc
>>> /bin/sh: Run.spc: not found
>>> make[1]: [test.rism1d] Error 127 (ignored)
>>> cd ./rism1d/spc && Run.spc-nacl
>>> /bin/sh: Run.spc-nacl: not found
>>> make[1]: [test.rism1d] Error 127 (ignored)
>>> cd ./rism1d/tip3p && Run.tip3p
>>> /bin/sh: Run.tip3p: not found
>>> make[1]: [test.rism1d] Error 127 (ignored)
>>> cd ./rism1d/tip3p && Run.tip3p-nacl
>>> /bin/sh: Run.tip3p-nacl: not found
>>> make[1]: [test.rism1d] Error 127 (ignored)
>>
>> Yea, each Run should have a ./ in front if it in the makefile. This
>> was already fixed as I understand it.
>
> Maybe it was overlooked? I downloaded the RC file this morning, just
> minutes before compiling/testing it.
>
> Gustavo.
I did the same thing this morning, and had the same problems (which I fixed by hand). Would I be correct in my guess that Dave's fixed this in his master version but has left the RC as it was?
Ben
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Apr 16 2010 - 11:30:04 PDT
