Re: [AMBER-Developers] final (!?!) release candidate for Amber11

From: Gustavo Seabra <gustavo.seabra.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:11:25 -0300

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Gustavo Seabra
> <gustavo.seabra.gmail.com> wrote:
>> Testing on Ubuntu 9.10, with gnu compilers v4.4.1,
>>
>> only AmberTools installed, serial, I get:
>>
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/seabra/local/amber/amber11/AmberTools/test'
>> 314 file comparisons passed
>> 0 file comparisons failed
>> 4 tests experienced errors
>> Test log file saved as logs/test_at_serial/2010-04-16_12-18-14.log
>> No test diffs to save!
>>
>> The tests that experienced errors are:
>> cd ./rism1d/spc && Run.spc
>> /bin/sh: Run.spc: not found
>> make[1]: [test.rism1d] Error 127 (ignored)
>> cd ./rism1d/spc && Run.spc-nacl
>> /bin/sh: Run.spc-nacl: not found
>> make[1]: [test.rism1d] Error 127 (ignored)
>> cd ./rism1d/tip3p && Run.tip3p
>> /bin/sh: Run.tip3p: not found
>> make[1]: [test.rism1d] Error 127 (ignored)
>> cd ./rism1d/tip3p && Run.tip3p-nacl
>> /bin/sh: Run.tip3p-nacl: not found
>> make[1]: [test.rism1d] Error 127 (ignored)
>
> Yea, each Run should have a ./ in front if it in the makefile.  This
> was already fixed as I understand it.

Maybe it was overlooked? I downloaded the RC file this morning, just
minutes before compiling/testing it.

Gustavo.

_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Apr 16 2010 - 11:30:02 PDT
Custom Search