On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:11 PM, David A. Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> Hi everyone:
>
> I've put a new RC up in the usual place:
>
> http://ambermd.org/downloads/AmberTools.14apr10.tar.bz2
> http://ambermd.org/downloads/Amber11.14apr10.tar.bz2
>
> I'm sure there will be some changes before release, but I hope this is last
> one that needs to be tested.
>
> There *are* a number of new test cases (rism1d, pbsa, PIMD), many of which
> were not being run in earlier RC's. So I will be disappointed but not too
> surprised if new problems show up; I hope the old ones are gone.
I found some trivial errors with the rism1d tests. I've attached a
patch for the makefile applied from AMBERHOME (easy enough to do by
hand). Once I applied the patch, they all pass it appears.
All the best,
Jason
>
> Scott: I think you should place bug 130 on low priority--there is a simple
> workaround for users, even if some test cases fail.
>
> If you can, please test AmberTools first (before untarring the Amber11 file),
> since that is all that many users will have.
>
> ...thanks....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
--
---------------------------------------
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Apr 14 2010 - 14:30:03 PDT
