Re: [AMBER-Developers] final (!?!) release candidate for Amber11

From: Jason Swails <>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:25:09 -0400

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:11 PM, David A. Case <> wrote:
> Hi everyone:
> I've put a new RC up in the usual place:
> I'm sure there will be some changes before release, but I hope this is last
> one that needs to be tested.
> There *are* a number of new test cases (rism1d, pbsa, PIMD), many of which
> were not being run in earlier RC's.  So I will be disappointed but not too
> surprised if new problems show up; I hope the old ones are gone.

I found some trivial errors with the rism1d tests. I've attached a
patch for the makefile applied from AMBERHOME (easy enough to do by
hand). Once I applied the patch, they all pass it appears.

All the best,

> Scott: I think you should place bug 130 on low priority--there is a simple
> workaround for users, even if some test cases fail.
> If you can, please test AmberTools first (before untarring the Amber11 file),
> since that is all that many users will have.
> ...thanks....dac
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list

Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student

AMBER-Developers mailing list

Received on Wed Apr 14 2010 - 14:30:03 PDT
Custom Search