Re: [AMBER-Developers] false test failures

From: Sally Pias <sallypias.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:05:26 -0600

Just wanted to confirm that defining AMBERHOME eliminated the problem
of false serial test failures (with empty *.dif files).

Have the test scripts been updated to check whether AMBERHOME is
defined and to print an error if not?


On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We were; transplant target is_amberhome_defined from test/Makefile_at
>
> scott
>
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 12:02:24PM -0700, Ross Walker wrote:
>>
>> I see this behavior if I forget to set AMBERHOME or have it set to an
>> incorrect directory.
>>
>> We should probably be checking for this in the test scripts.
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010, Sally Pias wrote:
>> >
>> > > I have successfully compiled the March 31 release candidate using
>> > > Intel 11.1 compilers.  In running the serial test suite, I have
>> > > repeatedly gotten the following results:
>> > >
>> > > Finished serial test suite for Amber 11 at Thu Apr  8 02:52:38 EDT
>> > 2010.
>> > >
>> > > 315 file comparisons passed
>> > > 95 file comparisons failed
>> > > 2 tests experienced errors
>> > >
>> > > Of the 95 failed file comparisons, 93 are "false," in that the *.dif
>> > > files are empty.  Any idea what is going on here?
>> >
>> > Nope...I don't see this behavior, nor to others...see the wiki page.
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sat Apr 10 2010 - 21:30:02 PDT
Custom Search