Re: [AMBER-Developers] 31 March release candidates for Amber

From: case <>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 21:03:30 -0400

On Fri, Apr 02, 2010, Volodymyr Babin wrote:
> gmake seems to be everywhere and this is not an unreasonable requirement;
> on the other hand, to actually switch to gmake I had to make another link
> in ~/bin [not a big deal, but ideally toplevel Makefile should pass make
> down, so that if user types 'gmake install', it just works]

Everything is *supposed* to use $(MAKE), so that could be set to gmake
in config.h. That would avoid links in /bin, which no doubt mess up
non-amber stuff.

If there are invocations that don't use $(MAKE) (and need gmake) they should
be fixed.

> >> #ifdef getchar
> >> # undef getchar
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> before "virtual getchar()" in mortsrc/guilib/console.hpp to make it
> >> through
> Wei should take a look at this because it might alter semantics.

cc-in to Wei.


AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Fri Apr 02 2010 - 18:30:02 PDT
Custom Search