Re: [AMBER-Developers] 31 March release candidates for Amber

From: Jason Swails <>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:40:04 -0400


If I need to make a small change to the manual (details about have changed, especially regarding its installation and
where it is included), where should I do that? They're small changes,
but should probably find their way in there before release.


On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:34 AM, case <> wrote:
> Latest RC is here:
> Notes:
> 1. EVB tests are still broken, but I think that Dan and/or Mark are working
>   on that.
> 2. Does anyone use ti-decomp?  Do we have an example (preferably small)
>   that is known to work?  Do we know that Amber10 was working correctly?
> 3. This RC contains the cuda test cases (but not the 2_million_atom one).
>   But I haven't tested the CUDA stuff myself.
> 4. Please report most things to the wiki:
>   I've updated a couple of platforms for this RC.  If something becomes
>   obsolete, (e.g. gets fixed!) please remove it from the wiki, so that
>   we can keep that as clean as possible.  (I reserve the right to edit or
>   remove things that get out of date.)
> Thanks to everyone who worked hard on running the test cases over the last
> few days!  There was a gigantic change of directory structure, which led to
> glitches...I hope we are getting down more to "real" errors now.
> ....dac
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list

Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:00:04 PDT
Custom Search