Re: [AMBER-Developers] configure_openmpi

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:04:49 -0500

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010, Jason Swails wrote:
>
> I was wondering if there is a specific reason why the
> --disable-mpi-f90 flag was put in configure_openmpi.

Just to save time in a long compile, and to avoid problems that might arise
from a feature we don't use.

> I've always changed FC from mpif77 to mpif90 simply because
> it feels more natural....

Well, as a "tester", I'd prefer that you do what users would be doing, so that
if there *are* problems, we find them out as soon as possible.

> the recent change in configure from mpif77 to mpif90.

OK, I give up. Ross doesn't understand this, and Lachele doesn't, and you
don't. I guess I can't expect users not to be confused. Go ahead and update
configure_openmpi.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Mar 02 2010 - 05:30:03 PST
Custom Search