On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010, Jason Swails wrote:
>>
>> The Makefile has lines
>>
>> simplepbsa$(SFX): simplepbsa.o gopt.o libpbsa.a sfflib syslib netlib c9x-complex
>> $(FC) -nofor_main -o simplepbsa$(SFX) simplepbsa.o gopt.o libpbsa.a \
>> $(LIBDIR)/libsff.a ../lib/nxtsec.o $(FLIBSF) $(LDFLAGS)
>>
>> which are invoked by the top-level Makefile_at.
>
> I guess this is all moot, since MengJeui has been updating things, but I still
> don't see how the top-level Makefile_at (which just does a "make install"
> in the pbsa directory) would trigger anything related to simplepbsa. It
> doesn't for me, on either Linux or Mac, and the compiler seems irrelevant.
>
> Can you see what is going on? I.e. something that is requiring either
> the "libinstall" rule or the "simplepbsa" rule?
It was slightly convoluted, but in the checkout version that was
giving me problems: in the version of pbsa/Makefile before Mengjuei
just changed it, simplepbsa$(SFX) was an invoked rule for the rule
libinstall. The libinstall rule for pbsa/Makefile was in turn called
by nab/Makefile for the install rule. However, Mengjuei has removed
simplepbsa$(SFX) from the libinstall rule in the current version
(10.31) per his last email on this topic.
All the best,
Jason
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
--
---------------------------------------
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Feb 09 2010 - 13:30:05 PST
