Re: [AMBER-Developers] netcdf reference despite no netcdf config

From: Lachele Foley <lfoley.ccrc.uga.edu>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:37:27 -0500

I just tried the new config (in the 8 Dec 09 version), and it still adds -DBINTRAJ to some of the options.


[glycamweb.glycam src]$ grep BINTRAJ config.h
CFLAGS= -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DBINTRAJ $(AMBERBUILDFLAGS)
OCFLAGS=-O3 -mtune=generic -msse -mfpmath=sse -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DBINTRAJ $(AMBERBUILDFLAGS)
FPP=cpp -traditional -P -DNO_SANDER_DIVCON -DBINTRAJ
FPPFLAGS=-P -DNO_SANDER_DIVCON -DBINTRAJ


:-) Lachele 
--
B. Lachele Foley, PhD '92,'02
Assistant Research Scientist
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, UGA
706-542-0263
lfoley.ccrc.uga.edu
----- Original Message -----
From: case
[mailto:case.biomaps.rutgers.edu]
To: AMBER Developers Mailing List
[mailto:amber-developers.ambermd.org]
Sent: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:36:04
-0500
Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] netcdf reference despite no netcdf
config
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009, Lachele Foley wrote:
> > 
> > I'm guessing that if the netcdf config
> > failed, then ptraj shouldn't be using netcdf stuff?
> 
> I've updated configure in a way that *should* do the right thing now, if
> netcdf configure fails.
> 
> It's too bad that we don't seem to have support for ia64, but that is a
> longer
> term problem.
> 
> ....dac
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> 
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Dec 08 2009 - 13:00:02 PST
Custom Search