Re: [AMBER-Developers] new release candidate for AmberTools

From: Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:08:58 -0500

Hi,

Let's move this discussion exclusively into bug 93.
Russ please try my ideas 1 and 3 which you should have already received.

thanks,
Scott

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:45:53AM -0800, Russ.Brown.Sun.COM wrote:
> No, the lex.mm_options.c and lex.dg_options.c files do not work with
> Solaris. The compiler complains about NAME and the make aborts.
>
> Russ
>
> On 11/10/09 04:44, case wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 09, 2009, Scott Brozell wrote:
> >
> >>This is bug 93. Im thinking of a workaround in the lex files.
> >>I have to refresh my memory on lex. Further details will be in bug 93.
> >>
> >
> >I'm not sure this can be fixed by changing the lex files. My idea is to do
> >what we did with leap: remove the rules that create lex.mm_options.c, and
> >just have that file (made with flex) be a part of the distribution. The
> >lex
> >file can still be around for future developers, but users don't need to
> >deal
> >with it.
> >
> >Scott or Russ: can you see if the lex.mm_options.c and lex.dg_options.c
> >files
> >(in /amber11/src/nab/lexc) will work on Solaris?

_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Nov 10 2009 - 12:30:02 PST
Custom Search