Re: amber-developers: AMBER CVS TREE MOVED

From: David A. Case <>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:14:46 -0400

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008, Ross Walker wrote:
> > A minor note: the "nab5" directory is outdated, and may well be
> > inconsistent with stuff in amber10/amber11. I think you should *not*
> > have nab5 available via CVS -- it is just asking for trouble. And I
> > don't think anyone needs it anyway.
> It is there because there were a load of links in amber11/src/semantics to
> ../../../nab5/semantics/ directory. I didn't know whether to just move the
> real files over here or keep the links. If we move these files across then
> we don't need the nab5 tree there - the same with dcqtp - should we keep the
> links for that or move it all into the amber11 tree?

The links to nab5 (in both amber10 and amber11, I suspect), can be moved
over (i.e. so we don't need the nab5 tree). The dcqtp stuff is more
complex...we need to get a better agreement with the QTP folks about how
to handle this code.

Received on Sun Sep 28 2008 - 05:08:05 PDT
Custom Search