amber-developers: [ Re: AMBER: Installation amber 9 on IBM SP4]

From: David A. Case <>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:17:27 -0700

Scott Brozell wrote:

> On a technical note for future Ambers using .F90 instead of .f90
> would also avoid this issue if ibm supports the popular conventions
> on uppercase extensions indicating preprocessing.

But this leaves us to the whims of Fortran compiler implementors, and "popular
conventions" are likely to fail with the next whiz-bang update from PGI (or
whoever). I'd rather have the Makefile do the work here.

Received on Sun Aug 27 2006 - 06:07:24 PDT
Custom Search