On Tue, Mar 28, 2006, David Mathews wrote:
> >
> Instead, I found that moving the line breaks (and continuation marks)
fixed
> the problem for the compiler.
>
> I propose changing the line from (starting line 567):
>
> write(6,'((5x,2(a,i4),a,2x,a,f10.5))') ( 'emap(', emap(n)%ist, ',' &
> , emap(n)%jst, ') ::', 'lambda = ' &
> , emap(n)%lambda, n = 1, nbias )
>
> to
>
> write(6,'((5x,2(a,i4),a,2x,a,f10.5))') &
> ( 'emap(', emap(n)%ist, ',', emap(n)%jst, &
> ') ::', 'lambda = ', emap(n)%lambda, n = 1, nbias )
>
Ah-ha! Finally I have a real argument against the people (Crowley, Wong)
who put commas at the beginning of a line, rather than directly after
the item they are separating.
I've put your change into CVS....dac
Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 23:49:33 PDT
