Re: [AMBER-Developers] link pmemd.cuda to pmemd.cuda_SPFP and pmemd.cuda.MPI to pmemd.cuda_SPFP.MPI

From: Brent Krueger <kruegerb.hope.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 04:24:52 -0500

I would say that a more important piece is that the soft-link makes it
clearer about what is happening

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 4:10 PM David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, Taisung Lee wrote:
> >
> >The current AMBER installation produces the pmemd.cuda binary by copying
> >pmemd.cuda_SPFP (in src/pmemd/src/CMakeLists.txt):
> >
> >2. A more fundamental question: should/can we do a soft link, instead
> >of copying?
>
> Yes: a soft-link would be better; but this hasn't seemed like a really
> important problem. Is it just a matter of saving a little disk space?
>
> ...thanks...dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>


-- 
______________________________________________________
Brent P. Krueger  (he/him) (What's this?
<https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/GLSEN%20Pronouns%20Resource.pdf>).......phone:
616 395 7629
Professor.........................................................fax:
   616 395 7118
Hope College..................................................Schaap Hall
2120
Department of Chemistry
Holland, MI     49423
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Feb 25 2022 - 01:30:02 PST
Custom Search