I think the disk size is not a problem. The issue is the potential
inconsistency between two executables.
Taisung
-----Original Message-----
From: David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:10 PM
To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] link pmemd.cuda to pmemd.cuda_SPFP and
pmemd.cuda.MPI to pmemd.cuda_SPFP.MPI
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, Taisung Lee wrote:
>
>The current AMBER installation produces the pmemd.cuda binary by
>copying pmemd.cuda_SPFP (in src/pmemd/src/CMakeLists.txt):
>
>2. A more fundamental question: should/can we do a soft link, instead
>of copying?
Yes: a soft-link would be better; but this hasn't seemed like a really
important problem. Is it just a matter of saving a little disk space?
...thanks...dave
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Feb 25 2022 - 07:30:02 PST
