Yeah, I managed to confuse my self, the build is using CMake but I was
looking at the Makefile below, that's not the right starting point in
this case.
However, there are a bunch of "possible FAILURE"s. 22 + 2 ignorable, do
you have that too? If so are those test references done with an older
version of AT? If so is it time to revisit them and produce updated ones?
On 10/22/21 11:22 PM, David A Case wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021, David Case wrote:
>>
>> Here is the code in $AMBERHOME/Makefile:
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> test.serial:
>> -(cd AmberTools/test && $(MAKE) test)
>> .(if [ -n "$(BUILDAMBER)" ] ; then \
>> cd test && $(MAKE) test; \
>> echo ""; \
>> echo "Summary of AmberTools serial tests:"; \
>> echo ""; cat ../logs/test_at_serial/at_summary; \
>> fi ;\
>> )
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sorry if my last email wasn't clear: $(BUILDAMBER) should be blank if only
> AmberTools is installed, so the pmemd tests (which are in $AMBERHOME/test
> folder) should not get invoked.
>
> It may that this is not working in all environments, but my tests work OK.
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
--
Ake Sandgren, HPC2N, Umea University, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
Internet: ake.hpc2n.umu.se Phone: +46 90 7866134 Fax: +46 90-580 14
Mobile: +46 70 7716134 WWW: http://www.hpc2n.umu.se
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sat Oct 23 2021 - 06:30:03 PDT
