I think requiring cuda 8 or later is reasonable, but cmake is still not
quite ready for prime time disruption of configure. It's getting there
though.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2021, 08:53 David Cerutti <dscerutti.gmail.com> wrote:
> The same cmake guru would also, hopefully, know how to make sure mdgx.cuda,
> as opposed to mdgx CPU that gets called mdgx.cuda, builds with cmake.
> Currently the ./configure route is needed to build the CUDA version.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:01 AM David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone:
> >
> > Dave Cerutti's mdgx cuda code appears to require CUDA 9 or greater. I'm
> > trying to get a feel for the need to continue to support CUDA 7.5 and 8.
> >
> > Do any of you still use those versions, perhaps on some legacy
> > machine? Are there other reasons to keep allowing these?
> >
> > Are there cmake gurus who know how to disable building mdgx_cuda if an
> > old version of NVCC is found?
> >
> > ..thx...dac
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER-Developers mailing list
> > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sat Apr 03 2021 - 12:00:03 PDT
