On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, Jason Swails wrote:
>We could just delete all branches that are ancestors of master (meaning
>they have no commits that are not in master) and haven't been updated in X
>days. We could also extend that to branches that may not have been merged
>yet, but also haven't been touched in over 2 years. (Noting that deleting
>a branch on gitlab doesn't delete those branches on developers' local
>machines.)
I'm fine with both of these options....thx..dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Dec 22 2020 - 10:30:02 PST
