On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> [Amber developers: does anyone know which parts of the code still need to know
> where the "molecules" are? I suspect we only have a molecular virial for
> backwards compatibility with codes written 30 years ago, but I could be wrong
> here -- I'm not really sure how the MC barostat works. Basically, I think
> we have all these checks and atom-reorderings to deal with a problem that
> really doesn't exist....]
In order to do things like by-molecule imaging, cpptraj assumes
molecules are contiguous. If they are not, all molecule-related stuff
(imaging by molecule, 'closest', etc) is disabled. I suspect the
molecule "wrapping" code in sander/pmemd might make this assumption as
well, but I'm not sure.
-Dan
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Aug 07 2020 - 12:00:03 PDT
