> On Oct 10, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Jamie Smith <jsmith.crackofdawn.onmicrosoft.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you, and I agree with you about including the Makefile build system. I think that it's always better to have a fallback plan than to not have one. Plus, to be honest it's a lot of pressure on me to have it perfectly working and perfectly complete by release time.
>
> Plus, aren't there a lot of users who only have a license for on old version of pmemd, and who just drop their old-version src folder into the latest AmberTools source folder?
No, this is explicitly instructed against and very much not supported.
I agree with dans advice, but cmake should be pushed hard to get it tested and perfected. It's much better than what we have right now :)
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason M. Swails
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Oct 10 2017 - 11:00:02 PDT
