Re: [AMBER-Developers] Changes to the CMake build system

From: Jason Swails <>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:32:24 -0400


> On Oct 10, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Jamie Smith <> wrote:
> Thank you, and I agree with you about including the Makefile build system. I think that it's always better to have a fallback plan than to not have one. Plus, to be honest it's a lot of pressure on me to have it perfectly working and perfectly complete by release time.
> Plus, aren't there a lot of users who only have a license for on old version of pmemd, and who just drop their old-version src folder into the latest AmberTools source folder?

No, this is explicitly instructed against and very much not supported.

I agree with dans advice, but cmake should be pushed hard to get it tested and perfected. It's much better than what we have right now :)


Jason M. Swails
AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Tue Oct 10 2017 - 11:00:02 PDT
Custom Search