Re: [AMBER-Developers] Should we add more troubleshooting to the Makefile?

From: David Cerutti <dscerutti.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 16:03:43 -0500

-Wall -Aneurysm

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> How does one get the verbose output to see all the gory details ?
>
> scott
>
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 03:51:45PM -0500, David Cerutti wrote:
> > .Gerald this looks to be exactly what I'd like to see. Reduces the
> output
> > clutter considerably but does not suppress actual errors, or warnings.
> I'm
> > going to apply this style to the mdgx and sander builds, then see about
> > branching out.
>
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:53:44PM +0100, Gerald Monard wrote:
> > Not sure it's the answer you want but in the sebomd directory, make will
> > output short lines like
> > [SEBOMD] [F90] [OPT] se_corrections_params.F90
> > [SEBOMD] [F90] [OPT] se_inter.F90
> > [SEBOMD] [F90] [OPT] se_corrections_tools.F90
> > [SEBOMD] [F90] [OPT] se_corrections_module.F90
> > Each line corresponds to a compilation, but you don't see all the long
> > usual compilation lines. This way, it is much easier to see warnings and
> > errors.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Feb 07 2017 - 13:30:02 PST
Custom Search