Re: [AMBER-Developers] Should we add more troubleshooting to the Makefile?

From: Scott Brozell <>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:55:53 -0500


How does one get the verbose output to see all the gory details ?


On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 03:51:45PM -0500, David Cerutti wrote:
> .Gerald this looks to be exactly what I'd like to see. Reduces the output
> clutter considerably but does not suppress actual errors, or warnings. I'm
> going to apply this style to the mdgx and sander builds, then see about
> branching out.

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:53:44PM +0100, Gerald Monard wrote:
> Not sure it's the answer you want but in the sebomd directory, make will
> output short lines like
> [SEBOMD] [F90] [OPT] se_corrections_params.F90
> [SEBOMD] [F90] [OPT] se_inter.F90
> [SEBOMD] [F90] [OPT] se_corrections_tools.F90
> [SEBOMD] [F90] [OPT] se_corrections_module.F90
> Each line corresponds to a compilation, but you don't see all the long
> usual compilation lines. This way, it is much easier to see warnings and
> errors.

AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Tue Feb 07 2017 - 13:00:03 PST
Custom Search