Jason (& all), yes, my intended meaning was that this is what we all
thought, definitely you included.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
wrote:
> I said basically the same thing to Dave that Carlos did privately. No
> intent to discourage, just to provide honest feedback.
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ken Merz <merzjrke.msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I agree with Hai and Carlos. David ran this by me the other day and all
> > he was doing was responding to feedback we have had at training sessions
> at
> > MSU where folks found our tutorial layout somewhat intimidating. What he
> > sent around was simply a proposal and not the final design by any means.
> I
> > suggest we let David formulate several mock ups we can discuss via e-mail
> > or at the dev meeting to get something together that is comfortable for
> all
> > (including keeping the status quo).
> >
>
> This is good information to lead with -- answers the "why?". Are these
> reviews anecdotal, or committed to paper/hard drive somewhere that can be
> shared?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Thu Sep 29 2016 - 15:30:02 PDT
